art work by John Ceprano
CINERGY (tm) - Peacebuilding... one person at a time

Fed Up!

The expression “fed up” has several meanings. One source states: “To have had more than enough of something or someone, or to be bored with or tired of the same.” The same source says that the expression dates back to the early 19th century when reportedly “the languid aristocracy were compared to farm animals that were force fed to make them plump for market”.

The phrase later became part of the general parlance in the late 19th century and was sometimes emphasized graphically in the extended forms ‘fed up to the eyeballs’, or ‘fed up to the back teeth’.

This week’s blog further explores this phrase – fed up – as it pertains to interpersonal conflict and more specifically referring to situations in which we have had enough of the other person’s antics or words, the situation itself, the impact of the interaction, and so on.

We get fed up for many other reasons when in conflict. These may include a sense of despair and disappointment – perhaps, realizing things are going nowhere, or deteriorating. Or we may feel we are saturated and that we no longer have the energy, time, resources, etc. to continue communications or even the relationship in some cases. The tension and seemingly unsolvable issues and dynamic also lead to such a feeling.

Bringing to mind a situation or person about which you are fed up will help answer the questions below.

  • How do you describe the expression fed up?
  • What is the situation with which you are fed up?
  • And/or what is the other person doing or saying that contributes to you feeling fed up?
  • In what way(s) does your definition apply to what you are experiencing (if you have not answered this above)?
  • How did things get to the point that you are fed up?
  • If you were to compare the feeling of being fed up in this situation to what happens if you overreact or have had too much of certain foods, what would that feeling be?
  • How else may that analogy resonate (as it applies to the feeling of being fed up in your interpersonal conflict)?
  • If you are wanting to feel less fed up regarding food, what do you typically do?
  • In what idiomatic ways may that technique be used in the interaction with which you are fed up?
  • What are you thinking now about the interaction that is different from when you began this series of questions?

What other ConflictMastery™ Quest(ions) may you add here?

Posted in Conflict Coaching, Metaphors | Leave a comment

Are You a Pot Stirrer?

This week’s ConflictMastery™ Quest(ions) blog is not about cooking, though the title and the metaphor seems to conjure up the picture of soups and stews simmering on top of a stove. When it comes to conflict the expression – stirring the pot – is defined by one source as “to cause unrest or dissent”. It is an idiomatic way to explore what some of us do when we disagree with a decision, or it may be what we do in reaction to something another person does or says that we do not like, or it may be when we raise issues on purpose to encourage debate or to cause unrest for some reason.

Taking the image a little further as it applies to interpersonal conflict, consider that the vegetables or meat in the pot represent various aspects of conflict-related matters floating around. These may be the issues, facts, needs, values, hopes, and expectations we bring to the pot. Some pieces fall to the bottom and may stick. Others float to the top. Other pieces float around in the juices. Some add flavour. Some get overdone. You get the picture.

If you are tempted to stir the pot about an interaction, the following questions may help digest what is in the pot.

  • How do you explain what the pot represents in the interaction you have in mind?
  • What ingredients are ones you put in the pot that make up the conflict? What ingredients has the other person put in?
  • What is the most tasty of your ingredients in the pot? What may the other person say are her or his most tasty ingredients?
  • What is the least tasty of your ingredients? What may the other person answer about her or his ingredients that are least tasty?
  • What in the pot could be easily removed without an impact on the other ingredients? What needs to be added?
  • What part or parts of all the other ingredients belong in the pot? Why is that?
  • What specifically do you want to stir up? Why is that?
  • What do you want to have happen by stirring the pot?
  • What would it be like if that did not happen (your answer to the previous question)? What would things be like if it did happen?
  • What are you thinking now about stirring the pot?

What other ConflictMastery™ Quest(ions) may you add here?

Posted in Conflict Coaching, Metaphors | Leave a comment

Get Your Goat

I haven’t heard this expression – get your goat – for a while and since writing this blog I have become intrigued with such idioms. This one typically refers to the reaction when someone does something that provokes, infuriates, or annoys us. According to one source the origin is described as follows:

“The dictionary definition of goat is ‘a ruminant quadruped of the genus Capra’. What’s that got to do with being angry? Given the meaning of ‘get your goat’, we might expect to find goat as a slang term meaning anger or annoyance. That meaning is recorded in the U.S. book Life in Sing Sing, 1904, which goat is given as a slang term for anger.

The phrase originated in the U.S. and the first entry in print that I can find comes from a fanciful story about a burst water pipe that was printed in the U.S. newspaper The Stevens Point Daily Journal, May 1909: “Wouldn’t that get your goat? We’d been transferring the same water all night from the tub to the bowl and back again.””

(For those who are interested, other suggested derivations may be found here.)

This week’s ConflictMastery™ Quest(ions) blog explores the idiom “get your goat” and suggests that readers bring to mind something specific that someone says or does to which you would apply this phrase. Think ‘outside of the goat’ for your answers!

  • What does someone say or do that gets your goat?
  • How do you describe the meaning of this expression and the sentiments you experience regarding that (your answer to the previous question)?
  • For what reasons does the other person’s actions or words get your goat?
  • What 3 other words describe the impact, other than ‘gets your goat’?
  • Picturing a goat, what about that visual resonates with your experience of the person and/or situation you have in mind?
  • What about the picture of a goat in your mind’s eye does not resonate?
  • What other animal may describe your experience of the situation or person you are thinking about?
  • Why is that (your answer to the previous question)?
  • What idiom about a reaction to feeling provoked may you create to apply to the animal you chose?
  • How do the questions here shift things, if they do, about the person or situation you had in mind for this exercise?

What other ConflictMastery™ Quest(ions) may you add here?

Posted in Conflict Coaching, Metaphors, Reactions | 2 Comments

Pain in the Neck

When we are in conflict with another person or the dynamics between us seem to be leaning towards one developing, some of us have a tendency to begin to find fault with the other person. We may say to ourselves or others that she or he is “getting on our nerves”. We may attribute negative motives to her or him. We may stay away from this person or show the emotions we are experiencing in various ways. One of the expressions some people use to describe people who are annoying us and to whom we are reacting in one or more of these ways is to say they are a “pain in the neck”.

According to one source the idiom pain in the neck comes as an euphemism of the ruder “pain in the a$$”. The origin is further described as follows:

“The idiom can be traced to the beginning of the 20th century. To go further, a German-based expression, ‘pain in the kiester’, reached the U.S. in the end of the 19th century. ‘Kiester’ originally meant simply a ‘case’ or ‘satchel’ but later acquired the informal meaning of ‘bottom’. Even earlier, annoying people were colloquially referred as ‘a pain’.”

This week’s ConflictMastery™ Quest(ions) blog invites readers to consider when you have used the expression ‘pain’ or ‘pain in the neck’ to describe your impression of another person. Please consider a specific incident and person in your answers to the following.

  • When you say the other person is a pain or a pain in the neck in the incident you have in mind, what do you mean?
  • What did the other person do or say that led you to say she or he is a pain or a pain in the neck?
  • How would you describe – in more detail – what the pain feels like?
  • How does the pain otherwise impact you – like your head and/or body?
  • If you literally get a physical pain in your neck from some other sorts of activity, such as when you sleep in an awkward position, incur a sports injury, etc., how is that different from your description about the pain you feel in your answers so far?
  • In what ways is the experience the same?
  • What do you do to mend a physical pain?
  • How may you apply those ways – figuratively speaking – to what you are experiencing regarding the person who, for you, is a pain in the neck?
  • What sorts of other ways may you mend the idiomatic pain in your neck?
  • When the pain in your neck is gone what do you hope to feel instead – about the other person? How do you physically want to feel?

What other ConflictMastery™ Quest(ions) may you add here?

Posted in Blame, Conflict Coaching | 2 Comments

You Could Cut the Air with a Knife

Have you ever heard this idiom – ‘you could cut the air with a knife’? Generally-speaking, it is a term that describes a tense situation between people and, at times, there is a sense of foreboding that something unpleasant is about to happen. When I looked up the derivation I did not find a lot to draw from. However, here is one commentator’s attempt at a physiological explanation:

“I suggest it’s to do with the fact that people hold back their breath in tense situations…Whatever the reason, there must be a consensus between people as to when the air is free and pleasant, easy to breathe, or the exact opposite: a physical presence, unfree and heavy, impossible to breathe, so that one could cut it with a knife.”

For me there is a strong physical and visual in this phrase – you could cut the air with a knife – and I have experienced the sensation when in conflict or observing others. It does feel like the air is thick with high and intense emotions and other things that you too may identify in your own interpersonal disputes or those you see or hear.

This week’s ConflictMastery™ Quest(ions) are aimed at readers who understand the experience inherent in these words as they relate to a specific conflict in which you are currently involved.

  • What is the situation in which you feel you could cut the air with a knife?
  • What is in the air that creates a sense of thickness that could be cut?
  • What does it feel like?
  • What other image does this notion of being able to cut the air with a knife conjure up for you, if any?
  • With what may the other person say the air is thick?
  • If others observed you two in conflict, what else may they add, if anything, to what is in the air?
  • How do you want to experience the air between you and the other person?
  • What may be different about what the other person wants the air to be like between you? What may be the same?
  • What could be used to cut through what is going on between you and the other person?
  • What else will it take to clear the air?

What other ConflictMastery™ Quest(ions) may you add here?

Posted in Conflict Coaching, Impact, Reactions | Leave a comment