art work by John Ceprano
CINERGY (tm) - Peacebuilding... one person at a time

Digging in our Heels

The meaning of “digging in our heels” according to one source is stubbornly resisting something or refusing to change, i.e. an opinion. The same source states that the origin is “probably related to the fact that if a person or an animal resists being pulled forward, the body will lean backwards and the heels will dig into the ground as the legs resist the forward motion.”

When we hold conflicting views from another person and we hold steadfastly to our own opinions and views, showing no room for change, this may be considered digging in our heels. It is a dynamic that often leads to both parties becoming stronger about their positions and asserting them with vigour.

What motivates us to dig in our heels? All sorts of things. It may be we feel fully convinced about our perspective and equally as convinced in the wrongness of the other person’s. It may be we resent or are highly offended by the other person’s position. We may be obstinate by nature and/or especially when it comes to the specific issues in dispute. We may feel fearful or threatened, unable to think outside a predictable, secure, and comfortable range of perspectives.

The image of digging in our heels is a vivid one and if it applies to you in a particular dispute you are in, consider this week’s ConflictMastery™ Quest(ions):

  • What is the situation about which you are digging in your heels?
  • What are you doing specifically that may be perceived as digging in your heels?
  • For what reasons are you digging in your heels?
  • What are you digging into?
  • What does it feel like to dig in your heels?
  • How does it help resolve the conflict – to dig in your heels? How does it hinder things?
  • How does digging in your heels help the relationship? How does it hinder it?
  • When you have observed someone else dig in their heels, how may you describe what that looks like?
  • How do you experience others who dig in their heels?
  • What support do you want or need when you dig in your heels so that you do not topple over?

What other ConflictMastery™ Quest(ions) may you add here?

Posted in Emotions in Conflict, Metaphors | Leave a comment

“I Didn’t Mean to Ruffle Your Feathers”

By now you will know I like metaphors and idioms as ways of providing a creative context to consider conflicts and their impact. There is something fun and interesting about doing so. What else I find is that looking at conflict with a different lens also helps my coaching clients (and me when I am in conflict) to gain distance from the emotions and the event.

The topic today – about the metaphor to ruffle someone’s feathers – conjures up an image I smile about. I find I can easily visualize a big or even a little bird looking miffed at something. Her or his eyes are wide – looking perturbed. The bird’s feathers are not falling softly but rather they are all over the place. Clearly, things are amiss.

The apparent etymology of the expression “to ruffle feathers”, as may be expected, is based on the idea of a bird whose feathers are not smooth because of fear or excitement. The phrase has come to refer to being and looking irritated or annoyed (or by ruffling someone’s feathers we are doing something that irritates or annoys her or him). That common happenstance – annoying or irritating someone or someone annoying or irritating us – does not always lead to external conflict. In any case, whether it is an internal conflict or external dispute, we undoubtedly show our negative reactions through our facial expressions and body language. As a consequence, we may show up like a bird with ruffled feathers.

If you relate to the phrase discussed in today’s blog, see if the following questions resonate for you.

  • Thinking of a specific dispute in which you experienced the phenomenon of having ruffled feathers, what led to that experience?
  • What did it feel like to have ruffled feathers?
  • What do you suppose you looked like at that time that gave the appearance of your feathers being ruffled?
  • What do your feathers represent in that conflict scenario?
  • What do you do that helps to smooth your ruffling?
  • What have others said or done that seems to help you? What doesn’t help?
  • When the other person in a conflict situation gets ruffled feathers from something you said or did, how would you describe their appearance?
  • What is the impact on you?
  • What helpful things do you usually say to persons (friends, family) who have ruffled feathers? What have you learned that does not help?
  • Having answered these questions, what do you think or feel about the expression to ruffle someone’s feathers that you didn’t before?

What other ConflictMastery™ Quest(ions) may you add here?

Posted in Metaphors, Reactions | 6 Comments

Getting Off on the Wrong Foot

Getting off on the wrong foot refers to those situations that sometimes happen during first encounters with others. This may be at the beginning of a relationship, project, discussion, or any other interaction, when we find ourselves off to an unproductive or uncomfortable start. Something may have happened in our interactions to create these experiences or we pick up something that is off-putting. Someone else may have gossiped to us about the person and their negative views stuck with us. Often though, there is not a clear reason for what seems to have led to disconnection and, at times, even animosity.

The origin of this phrase – getting off on the wrong foot – is not clear from the resources I consulted. One reference suggested this phrase may come from the long-standing preference people have for the right. For instance, we have right and left and right and wrong, which tends to associate left with wrong. Also, there is a suggestion in the same source that in ancient Greece it was considered unlucky to put the left foot on the floor, or into one’s shoe, before the right foot. Yet another idea is that the concept of a right foot and a wrong foot comes from the military, where in order to march in step soldiers all have to start with the same foot.

Whatever the origin, the notion of getting off on the wrong foot is an experience we have or sense that has the potential for building the sorts of dynamics that perpetuate interpersonal conflict. At these times, redeeming ourselves or the other person doing so is often fraught with challenges. The quote by Will Rogers (also attributed to Oscar Wilde) “you never get a second chance to make a good first impression” may prevail at these times. As short-sighted and not conflict masterful as that may be, somehow, the negativity, ill feelings, poor impressions, and so on seem to take over.

This week’s ConflictMastery™ Quest(ions) blog is aimed at readers who feel they got off on the wrong foot with someone and possibly, discord developed between you. Thinking of a specific situation in which this occurred will be helpful when answering the following questions:

  • Generally-speaking, what does the expression to get off on the wrong foot with someone mean to you?
  • In a particular situation when this occurred, at what point did you feel you got off on the wrong foot with another person?
  • What specifically did the other person say or do that contributed to that experience? What did you say or do that may have also contributed? Or, what may someone else have said or done that resulted in this sort of impact?
  • How may the other person’s version of what occurred between you be the same or similar to yours? What may she or he perceive differently?
  • What evolved as a consequence of getting off on the wrong foot?
  • What did that feel like?
  • How may you describe what you hoped or expected about how you and the other person would connect?
  • How may you still make that happen, if you want to?
  • What may be the biggest challenge?
  • How will you overcome that challenge to do your part of getting on the ‘right’ foot?

What other ConflictMastery™ Quest(ions) may you add here?

Posted in Metaphors, Reactions | Leave a comment

Letting Go

For many of us when a conflict is ostensibly over there are residual feelings and emotions. I have referred to these in previous blogs as the remnants from past conflicts that shroud future conflicts when our feelings and/or the issues in dispute have not been resolved. This post further explores the act of ‘letting go’ of the remnants of conflict.

All sorts of circumstances affect whether and how and how fast we move past our conflicts. Certain people, certain sorts of disputes, certain times, certain moods, and other variables have an impact on how we react to any given situation and the other person. These factors and others also have an impact on when and how we process what occurred in the aftermath and we do so according to our individual and idiosyncratic ways of managing conflict and our emotions. In the end, some of us are able to put things behind us quicker than others.

Letting go essentially means that we do not continue to be adversely affected by whatever occurred in the conflict and the emotions generated within it. We also do not let the dynamic affect our ongoing relationship with the other person. Further, what was said and done do not get regurgitated at a future time and we do not hold onto what was said or done by the other person and ourselves in unforgiving and resentful ways.

These are challenging things to do in some circumstances and may not be possible in all. However, letting go of the vestiges of our conflicts that we do not want to carry around, and doing so in a timely and meaningful way, reflects conflict mastery. And, this ConflictMastery™ Quest(ions) blog aims to provide an opportunity to consider why you let go of some and not other conflicts. To do so, consider a specific dispute you are holding on to when answering the pertinent questions.

  • What are you not letting go of in that particular dispute?
  • What is it about those things (that thing) that lingers on?
  • What does holding on to those things (that thing) satisfy – such as a need, hope, or expectation?
  • What do you want to have happen in this situation or relationship that may be achieved by holding on?
  • If you let go, what is the worst case scenario you imagine?
  • What worst case scenario may result if you do not let go?
  • If you decide to begin the process of letting go, what part of what happened would you let go of first?
  • What does it feel like thinking of beginning to let go?
  • What is the best case scenario, if you let go?
  • What are you thinking now about the idea of letting go?

What other ConflictMastery™ Quest(ions) may you add here?

Posted in Choice in Conflict, Post-Conflict | 4 Comments

“Settle Down”

It often seems that phrases like, “settle down”, “just calm yourself”, “you don’t need to get upset”, etc. lead to increased defensiveness and other negative reactions, rather than less, as the speaker likely hoped. Hushing hand gestures result in the same sort of negative response. That is, comments or gestures of this nature are usually experienced as dismissive and undermining. Those on the receiving end generally resent that their views and feelings are being quieted, put down, or minimized.

What is more, though it may not be the intention, using such statements or physical messages – in an apparent attempt to quiet another – sets up a sort of power imbalance. The person stating or doing them appears to be superior and somehow in charge or in control of the situation and the other person. There is even the appearance of an adult admonishing a child, or a teacher shushing a student.

Why do we use these techniques? Not to support using the words or actions described here, it may be that when we try to calm another it is due to being at a loss about how to have a discussion that does not escalate or go off topic. There may be some urgency and frustration and a sense the other person we are trying to quiet is derailing the conversation. We may fear our own emotions or the other person’s. We may consider emotions as a sign of weakness or a manipulative ploy. In any case, “settle down” and other phrases and actions aiming to quiet another do not usually work to do anything helpful to the interaction.

How to respond as to not shut off the person or conversation, to acknowledge the emotions, and not be put off by them are all challenges for conflict masterful people to overcome. So, if you tend to use statements such as, “settle down” or make hushing gestures to the other person with whom you are in conflict, or someone says or does such things to you, consider this week’s ConflictMastery™ Quest(ions):

  • When someone has said or done something in an effort to quiet you, what specifically did she or he say or do?
  • What was that like for you?
  • What do you think was going on for the other person to have said or done that?
  • What did you say or do in response? What did you want to say back that you did not?
  • What could the other person have said or done instead that would have been more effective for you?
  • Thinking of a specific situation in which you have made a statement or gesture such as ones referred to in this blog, what specifically did you say or do?
  • What do you think compelled you to say or do that?
  • How did the other person respond?
  • How was her or his response consistent with what you were hoping for? How was it not consistent?
  • Thinking about it now, what may have been a more conflict masterful approach?

What other ConflictMastery™ Quest(ions) may you add here?

Posted in Emotions in Conflict, Reactions | Leave a comment