The other day I used the word ‘aftermath’ in front of my friend’s 9-year-old daughter Maya and she thought it a strange expression. I had just asked her mother what the aftermath was of the dispute she had experienced. Maya is a great math student and asked ‘Where does math fit in?’ I explained to her what I think the word means by saying it’s like asking about what happened. She asked why that word is used and then, I realized I was curious about the derivation, too. So, I decided to look up the term and this is what Free Dictionary says. They define the word as:
- A consequence, especially of a disaster or misfortune: famine as an aftermath of drought.
- A period of time following a disastrous event: in the aftermath of war.
Admittedly, I don’t think when I refer to the aftermath that they arise from calamitous events as the definition implies. But, the consequences of some of our interpersonal disputes – the ones that remain unresolved internally and externally – are difficult whether or not they may be described as disasters. In any case, this blog invites readers to consider the aftermath of an interpersonal dispute that continues to linger in some ways and upset you as you answer the following questions:
- What happened in that dispute?
- What is lingering for you about it?
- What issues are most unresolved between you and the other person?
- What are the emotions that you continue to feel? How is the aftermath effecting you most these days?
- What do you wish you had said or done at the time?
- What is your relationship like with the other person now?
- What do you know about how the other person is experiencing the aftermath?
- What would you like to see reconciled so that the aftermath wouldn’t be so difficult?
- What is there to learn from the aftermath?
- How might you improve the aftermath you are experiencing?
- What else occurs to you as you consider these questions?
- What insights do you have?
#interpersonalconflict
#conflict
#coaching
#conflictcoaching
#conflictmanagementcoaching
#conflictmanagement
#disputeresolution


When we are in conflict – within ourselves or with another person – we typically find ourselves focusing on something specific about what we are feeling and what happened. And our energy around that something grows exponentially the more we do so. Our hearts and brains take us to negative places, and we can get stuck there – building on the version of the facts that upsets us most and our feelings connected to those.
This quote is an important one when it comes to strengthening our conflict competence. And I think some of us lose sight of its meaning when we are in the midst of conflict. In typical fashion, when we and the other person have differing opinions about a matter, we each hold an opinion about what the optimum outcome is and how to reach it. We might remain civilized in our initial exchange about what we each want – to the extent that neither becomes overly aggressive with their perspectives. This may be the case until we realize that the other person won’t back down from their opposition to our viewpoints. Then, as the conversation evolves and it looks as though things might not be resolvable, emotions start to take over and the chances of regaining some equilibrium decline.