art work by John Ceprano
CINERGY (tm) - Peacebuilding... one person at a time

Let Sleeping Dogs Lie

When it comes to some interpersonal conflicts the expression let sleeping dogs lie may be used to mean “to leave things as they are; especially, to avoid restarting or rekindling an old argument; to leave disagreements in the past”. Certainly a sleeping dog is a lovely sight. But to me so are most dogs who are awake. Presumably the image of this metaphor is meant to conjure up excessive yapping and overly rambunctious canines!

Historically-speaking, the idiom – let sleeping dogs lie – goes back as far as the 14th century according to one resource found in my research. It was recorded in French and literally translated as “Do not wake the dog that sleeps”. Going further back to the Book of Proverbs (26:17) a similar phrase to reads “He that passes by, and meddles with strife belonging not to him, is like one that takes a dog by the ears”. These and other like phrases all denote the same type of message – essentially, do not instigate trouble and leave situations alone lest they cause problems.

It seems to me, not only in my personal life but when providing conflict management coaching to clients, that whether to let sleeping dogs lie arises as a common inner debate. Many of us wonder about raising issues that do not feel resolved for us. Concerns may be that doing so may stir things up, create more conflict, or not really reconcile the issues or relationship. On the other hand, by not waking the sleeping dog we may continue to ruminate and feel unresolved about important things including the relationship with the other person.

This week’s ConflictMastery™ Quest(ions) blog invites you to consider a situation in which you are wondering about whether to let sleeping dogs lie.

  • What is the situation?
  • Why specifically are you hesitant about raising this with the other person?
  • What are your biggest fears if you do? How realistic are those fears?
  • What does the sleeping dog represent, if you have not referred to that yet?
  • What opportunities are you missing regarding the conflict if you let the sleeping dog lie?
  • What opportunities is the other person missing if you let the sleeping dog lie?
  • Picture yourself six months from now. What regrets, if any, may you have if you do not raise the matters relating to the situation?
  • What positive result is possible if you imagine waking up the sleeping dog?
  • What might you also be grateful about if you wake up the sleeping dog?
  • How might you awaken the sleeping dog in a conflict-masterful way, if you decide to do so?

What other ConflictMastery™ Quest(ions) may you add here?

Posted in Avoiding, Conflict Coaching, Fears, Metaphors | 2 Comments

Upsetting the Applecart

When we accuse someone of upsetting the applecart we generally think that person is causing trouble and creating difficulties by doing or saying something that challenges the status quo. Of the four variations of the source of the expression that I read about, the most basic and generic derivation refers to farmers in the 1800s who would bring applecarts loaded with neatly piled, fresh apples for sale to market. The story goes that when “a clumsy person” knocked over the cart, it spills all the apples and spoils the farmer’s plan to sell the apples. The phrase subsequently came to mean knocking things off balance – in a situation and relationship.

This idiom came back into my awareness just this past week when a coaching client told me about a situation with his manager. He said, “If she hadn’t upset the applecart by making that policy I’d have a better chance for a promotion – sooner than later!” When I asked the client – I’ll call him Henry – to tell me more about what happened he continued to use the idiom. Henry described himself as the cart rolling along nicely being pushed by his ambition and confidence. He said when his boss changed a policy about the requirements to become a team leader he realized his opportunity to move ahead as quickly as he had hoped was kyboshed.

I asked Henry what the apples in the cart were and he responded, “they were my hopes, my skills, my hard work, and my dedication that toppled out of the cart”. He told me he confronted his boss in his anger (“a career limiting move”) and a conflict ensued. Henry subsequently retained me to “put the apples back in the cart”. I thought this was an interesting way that Henry discussed his interests and needs and I wanted to pass it on to you (with his permission).

This week’s ConflictMastery™ Quest(ions) blog invites readers to consider how vivid this idiom is when it comes to an interpersonal conflict you are or were involved in, and you might use this expression.

  • Thinking of a current or past interpersonal conflict, what did the other person say or do that upset the apple cart?
  • What would you say the cart represents?
  • What do the apples represent?
  • What upset you most about this situation? What did her or his actions “spoil”?
  • What did you say or do in response?
  • How did your response help? In what ways might you have contributed to the cart of apples toppling over?
  • How might you put the applecart upright again? (For instance, what would you say or do, and what else would it take to do so?)
  • How would you make sure the apples you referred to in question 2 are back – safely and securely in the cart?
  • How will it feel when things are back in place?
  • What inner resources, experience, or wisdom do you have that will facilitate that (your answer to the previous question)?

What other ConflictMastery™ Quest(ions) may you add here?

Posted in Conflict Coaching, Metaphors | Leave a comment

“They” Say Don’t Go To Bed Angry

Many years ago I had a friend who made fun of certain words and expressions we commonly use. For instance, she would ask who are “they” who make up rules about what is acceptable behaviour or wise advice like, “They say don’t swim after you eat”, or “They say if you tell the truth it becomes a part of your past. If you lie it becomes part of your future”. (I am not attributing these expressions as I am not able to find their derivation. They are time-worn statements I have heard as long as I can remember.)

In any case, these and many more phrases preceded by “they say” abound, and my friend asked one day if there is a place to find who “they” are. We laughed at that notion of how we would locate “them” and what “they” would be like. We wondered what our conversation would be like, if “they” drink coffee, whether “they” would invite us to meet with them again. I could go on.

I was remembering my friend the other day when I heard a conflict management coaching client state another time-worn statement about a dispute he was trying to manage. His words were, “They say it’s not a good idea to go to bed angry”. This and other “they say” statements have some wisdom to them and seem to make sense. But when I asked the client why it is a good idea to not go to bed angry, he said he really didn’t know because he needs some time and space to think things out. After all, “they say to sleep on it” (i.e. conflicts). Right?

There seems to be lots of expressions to be applied to conflict situations and they will undoubtedly be subjects of future ConflictMastery™ Quest(ions) blogs. For example, what about the phrases all preceded by “they say” such as: “let sleeping dogs lie”; “don’t add to the problem”; “forgive and forget”; and you likely have more to add (and feel free to do so in the Comments section).

For this week’s ConflictMastery™ Quest(ions) blog, the questions invite readers to deconstruct the phrase “they say don’t go to bed angry”.

  • Do you agree with the statement “don’t go to bed angry”?
  • If so, why?
  • If not, why not?
  • Who has made that statement to you, if anyone? Under what circumstances?
  • What made sense about the advice at the time? What didn’t?
  • Who have you made this expression to, if anyone? What made sense about it at the time?
  • What didn’t make sense?
  • As you think about this statement – “don’t go to bed angry” – under what circumstances do you think it applies? When does it not apply?
  • What other conflict-related homilies beginning with “they say” make sense to you? Why?
  • What “they say” expressions about conflict do not make sense to you? Why?

What other ConflictMastery™ Quest(ions) may you add here?

Posted in Conflict Coaching | 4 Comments

Driving a Wedge Between People

As you may know, the phrase driving a wedge between people describes the act of causing people to oppose or turn against one another – to spoil their relationship.

This expression seems to be used when referring to what a third party does that results in a schism between two (or more) others. That is, the two (or more) people may not be in conflict or there may be some tension but they are not necessarily disconnected. However, for some reason the third party attempts to turn one or both against the other.

Reasons that someone may intentionally drive a wedge between others undoubtedly vary. It may have to do with jealousy, insecurities about being left out, feeling territorial about one of the people, bearing negative feelings towards one, wanting to protect one, and disapproving of the relationship.

Driving a wedge may lead to conflict between the two people and/or between one or both of them and the person driving the wedge. In any case, it is helpful to consider the reasons that someone would drive a wedge between others. This is whether you have been on the receiving end of someone’s efforts to do this or have done so yourself. This week’s ConflictMastery™ Quest(ions) blog invites you to consider when you have driven a wedge between others, or someone has done that with you and another.

  • If you have ever tried to or succeeded in driving a wedge between others, what reasons motivated you to drive the wedge between those people?
  • What specifically did you do? What was the wedge? In what ways did you drive it?
  • How did you succeed in driving the wedge? What does that mean for you – that you succeeded? What does it mean for the two or more people?
  • If you did not succeed, what happened? What does that mean for you? What does it mean for the people that you drove the wedge between or among?
  • What reactions did you have from the people between or among which you tried to drive a wedge, other than what you may have answered so far?
  • When someone has driven a wedge between you and one or more others, what did she or he do specifically? What was the wedge? In what ways did she or he drive it?
  • How did the person succeed? How did she or he not succeed?
  • What was the experience like for you?
  • Where are things at now between you and the person who drove the wedge? Where are things at now between you and the other person or person between whom the wedge was driven?
  • What lessons are there to be learned from driving a wedge between people?

What other ConflictMastery™ Quest(ions) may you add here?

Posted in Conflict Coaching, Metaphors | Leave a comment

Stepping Into Someone’s Shoes

You will know from the ConflictMastery™ Quest(ions) blogs that the series of questions usually invites readers to look at the conflict from the other person’s viewpoint, as well as their own. It is a typical approach for helping people understand the full picture of conflict situations, including their contribution to the dynamic.

The phrase stepping into someone’s shoes – the subject of this week’s blog – is commonly used to describe a way to envision the situation from the other person’s perspective. As one source said, “only the wearer knows where the shoe pinches”.

I have always liked the folk wisdom in the expression stepping into someone’s shoes. However, when I thought about it more, I smiled as I imagined myself stepping into fancy high heels (since I don’t usually wear them), or shoes too big for me, ones that are too small, styles that typically make me cringe or laugh, men’s footwear, and other sorts of shoes that you will not find me wearing!

This all became fodder for today’s blog that invites you to consider a conflict situation in which you may not have a full grasp of where the other person is coming from. Stepping into her or his shoes – and your own too – in a metaphoric way may be a fitting (excuse the pun) way to consider the dynamic.

  • Standing in your own shoes, what is your perspective on what happened in that situation you have in mind?
  • What, if anything, about your version are you most uncomfortable conveying? Why is that? What else does not fit exactly right? Why is that?
  • Standing in the other person’s shoes, how would she or he explain what happened?
  • What did the other person specifically say or do in the conflict that resulted in you feeling a pinch?
  • If you stepped into the other person’s shoes, what may you experience as a pinch as a result of what you said or did?
  • How do you describe the other person’s shoes as you attempt to step in them?
  • What fits about them? What doesn’t?
  • If you asked the other person to step into your shoes, what would you like her or him to feel?
  • What may fit well for her or him? What may not?
  • What is different about the other person’s shoes that you can accept anyway? What do you want her or him to accept about yours?

What other ConflictMastery™ Quest(ions) may you add here?

Posted in Conflict Coaching, Conflict Perceptions, Empathy, Metaphors | 2 Comments