art work by John Ceprano
CINERGY (tm) - Peacebuilding... one person at a time

Getting Off on the Wrong Foot

Getting off on the wrong foot refers to those situations that sometimes happen during first encounters with others. This may be at the beginning of a relationship, project, discussion, or any other interaction, when we find ourselves off to an unproductive or uncomfortable start. Something may have happened in our interactions to create these experiences or we pick up something that is off-putting. Someone else may have gossiped to us about the person and their negative views stuck with us. Often though, there is not a clear reason for what seems to have led to disconnection and, at times, even animosity.

The origin of this phrase – getting off on the wrong foot – is not clear from the resources I consulted. One reference suggested this phrase may come from the long-standing preference people have for the right. For instance, we have right and left and right and wrong, which tends to associate left with wrong. Also, there is a suggestion in the same source that in ancient Greece it was considered unlucky to put the left foot on the floor, or into one’s shoe, before the right foot. Yet another idea is that the concept of a right foot and a wrong foot comes from the military, where in order to march in step soldiers all have to start with the same foot.

Whatever the origin, the notion of getting off on the wrong foot is an experience we have or sense that has the potential for building the sorts of dynamics that perpetuate interpersonal conflict. At these times, redeeming ourselves or the other person doing so is often fraught with challenges. The quote by Will Rogers (also attributed to Oscar Wilde) “you never get a second chance to make a good first impression” may prevail at these times. As short-sighted and not conflict masterful as that may be, somehow, the negativity, ill feelings, poor impressions, and so on seem to take over.

This week’s ConflictMastery™ Quest(ions) blog is aimed at readers who feel they got off on the wrong foot with someone and possibly, discord developed between you. Thinking of a specific situation in which this occurred will be helpful when answering the following questions:

  • Generally-speaking, what does the expression to get off on the wrong foot with someone mean to you?
  • In a particular situation when this occurred, at what point did you feel you got off on the wrong foot with another person?
  • What specifically did the other person say or do that contributed to that experience? What did you say or do that may have also contributed? Or, what may someone else have said or done that resulted in this sort of impact?
  • How may the other person’s version of what occurred between you be the same or similar to yours? What may she or he perceive differently?
  • What evolved as a consequence of getting off on the wrong foot?
  • What did that feel like?
  • How may you describe what you hoped or expected about how you and the other person would connect?
  • How may you still make that happen, if you want to?
  • What may be the biggest challenge?
  • How will you overcome that challenge to do your part of getting on the ‘right’ foot?

What other ConflictMastery™ Quest(ions) may you add here?

Posted in Metaphors, Reactions | Leave a comment

Letting Go

For many of us when a conflict is ostensibly over there are residual feelings and emotions. I have referred to these in previous blogs as the remnants from past conflicts that shroud future conflicts when our feelings and/or the issues in dispute have not been resolved. This post further explores the act of ‘letting go’ of the remnants of conflict.

All sorts of circumstances affect whether and how and how fast we move past our conflicts. Certain people, certain sorts of disputes, certain times, certain moods, and other variables have an impact on how we react to any given situation and the other person. These factors and others also have an impact on when and how we process what occurred in the aftermath and we do so according to our individual and idiosyncratic ways of managing conflict and our emotions. In the end, some of us are able to put things behind us quicker than others.

Letting go essentially means that we do not continue to be adversely affected by whatever occurred in the conflict and the emotions generated within it. We also do not let the dynamic affect our ongoing relationship with the other person. Further, what was said and done do not get regurgitated at a future time and we do not hold onto what was said or done by the other person and ourselves in unforgiving and resentful ways.

These are challenging things to do in some circumstances and may not be possible in all. However, letting go of the vestiges of our conflicts that we do not want to carry around, and doing so in a timely and meaningful way, reflects conflict mastery. And, this ConflictMastery™ Quest(ions) blog aims to provide an opportunity to consider why you let go of some and not other conflicts. To do so, consider a specific dispute you are holding on to when answering the pertinent questions.

  • What are you not letting go of in that particular dispute?
  • What is it about those things (that thing) that lingers on?
  • What does holding on to those things (that thing) satisfy – such as a need, hope, or expectation?
  • What do you want to have happen in this situation or relationship that may be achieved by holding on?
  • If you let go, what is the worst case scenario you imagine?
  • What worst case scenario may result if you do not let go?
  • If you decide to begin the process of letting go, what part of what happened would you let go of first?
  • What does it feel like thinking of beginning to let go?
  • What is the best case scenario, if you let go?
  • What are you thinking now about the idea of letting go?

What other ConflictMastery™ Quest(ions) may you add here?

Posted in Choice in Conflict, Post-Conflict | 4 Comments

“Settle Down”

It often seems that phrases like, “settle down”, “just calm yourself”, “you don’t need to get upset”, etc. lead to increased defensiveness and other negative reactions, rather than less, as the speaker likely hoped. Hushing hand gestures result in the same sort of negative response. That is, comments or gestures of this nature are usually experienced as dismissive and undermining. Those on the receiving end generally resent that their views and feelings are being quieted, put down, or minimized.

What is more, though it may not be the intention, using such statements or physical messages – in an apparent attempt to quiet another – sets up a sort of power imbalance. The person stating or doing them appears to be superior and somehow in charge or in control of the situation and the other person. There is even the appearance of an adult admonishing a child, or a teacher shushing a student.

Why do we use these techniques? Not to support using the words or actions described here, it may be that when we try to calm another it is due to being at a loss about how to have a discussion that does not escalate or go off topic. There may be some urgency and frustration and a sense the other person we are trying to quiet is derailing the conversation. We may fear our own emotions or the other person’s. We may consider emotions as a sign of weakness or a manipulative ploy. In any case, “settle down” and other phrases and actions aiming to quiet another do not usually work to do anything helpful to the interaction.

How to respond as to not shut off the person or conversation, to acknowledge the emotions, and not be put off by them are all challenges for conflict masterful people to overcome. So, if you tend to use statements such as, “settle down” or make hushing gestures to the other person with whom you are in conflict, or someone says or does such things to you, consider this week’s ConflictMastery™ Quest(ions):

  • When someone has said or done something in an effort to quiet you, what specifically did she or he say or do?
  • What was that like for you?
  • What do you think was going on for the other person to have said or done that?
  • What did you say or do in response? What did you want to say back that you did not?
  • What could the other person have said or done instead that would have been more effective for you?
  • Thinking of a specific situation in which you have made a statement or gesture such as ones referred to in this blog, what specifically did you say or do?
  • What do you think compelled you to say or do that?
  • How did the other person respond?
  • How was her or his response consistent with what you were hoping for? How was it not consistent?
  • Thinking about it now, what may have been a more conflict masterful approach?

What other ConflictMastery™ Quest(ions) may you add here?

Posted in Emotions in Conflict, Reactions | Leave a comment

Post-Conflict Guilt

After a conflict, some of us experience a sense of guilt. We may realize we contributed to the discord by saying or doing something that we know offended the other person. We may have been insulting. We may have not told the truth. We may have retaliated, gossiped, or acted in our self-interest – to the other person’s detriment. These and other actions may haunt us after the conflict and lead to continuing self-blame.

According to Wikipedia, the term guilt “is a cognitive or an emotional experience that occurs when a person realizes or believes—accurately or not—that he or she has compromised his or her own standards of conduct or has violated a moral standard, and bears significant responsibility for that violation. It is closely related to the concept of remorse.”

Lots of things happen when we experience guilt about a situation. For instance, we carry around our negative emotions and feel badly for extended periods. We continually berate ourselves. Some of us try to compensate for what happened by being overly solicitous and make efforts to get back into the other person’s good graces. Some of us apologize before we (or the other person) are ready. We may over-explain or try to excuse ourselves and attempt to make up for what we said or did in other ways.

If you feel guilty about a situation that occurred, this week’s ConflictMastery™ Quest(ions) blog will hopefully help you find your way through it:

  • About what are you experiencing guilt?
  • What other words describe your feelings of guilt?
  • How does the concept of guilt – according to the above overview and definition – apply to your experience in this conflict situation, if it does?
  • What would you do or say differently if you had a chance to redo the interaction that occurred?
  • What do you think you would achieve by doing so – that you did not the first time?
  • What precluded you from doing that at the time?
  • What could you do to feel less guilty that would also be effective, in some way, for the other person?
  • In what ways would it work for you? How would it be more effective for the other person?
  • Going forward, what do you think you will do differently to preclude feelings of guilt?
  • What learning or insights have you gained from your answers to this week’s blog?

What other ConflictMastery™ Quest(ions) may you add here?

Posted in Emotions in Conflict, Reactions | Leave a comment

Sticks and Stones May Break My Bones

Do you remember the expression “sticks and stones may break my bones but names will never hurt me”? If so, you may also recall, as I do, that it was (and may still be) a stock response to verbal bullying in grade school playgrounds. The meaning is evident and is simply described by one resource as follows: “A response to an insult, implying that ‘You might be able to hurt me by physical force but not by insults’.” Apparently, the earliest use of this expression is from an American periodical, The Christian Recorder (March 1862), which further added to this adage – by way of explanation: “True courage consists in doing what is right, despite the jeers and sneers of our companions.”

The phrase “sticks and stones may break my bones but names will never hurt me” has no doubt been superseded by more current streetwise comebacks. Though we often consider such techniques as ones that children use, adults also employ jeers, insults, sneers, or name-calling (see a previous blog called Name-Calling) and despite the notion that names (read also: jeers, insults, etc.) do not hurt, they do. They also serve to polarize and create a power imbalance that precludes effective conflict engagement and communications. Names, jeers, and insults initiate and perpetuate conflict in ways that can leave indelible marks by echoing indefinitely in the ears of those on the receiving end.

Not to condone taunts such as those described above, I have wondered what compels their use. It may be that people who employ these and other such methods never learned more constructive ways of managing themselves and others. Perhaps, they have run out of other ways to cope, defend, or express themselves in response to the emotional pain they are experiencing. It may be they learned such techniques from bullying role models. They could have found such methods give them a sense of power or compensates for their insecurities. These thoughts on why such techniques are used do not make them acceptable or excusable. Rather, they are meant to help understand the drivers that motivate the use of these methods and considerations for those to whom they are directed.

Today’s ConflictMastery™ Quest(ions) blog asks readers who tend to jeer, insult, sneer, or name-call in conflict and those who are the brunt of such techniques, to consider situations when either or both occurred.

  • In a conflict situation in which you have sneered, jeered, insulted the other person, called her or him names, etc., what specific technique(s) did you use? What did you specifically say or do?
  • What motivated you to use that technique/those techniques?
  • What were you aiming to achieve by doing so? What did you accomplish? What did you not achieve?
  • Under what circumstances, in general, do you find yourself using the technique(s) you referred to in your answer to the first question?
  • What conflict masterful technique(s), in general, may work more effectively if you want to learn new methods in the circumstances you described?
  • Considering a situation when someone has name-called, sneered, jeered, or insulted you in a conflict, what did she or he specifically say?
  • What do you think compelled her or him to say or do that?
  • What did you say or do in response?
  • How did that work? How did it not work?
  • What other response do you think may have worked better now that you think about it?

What other ConflictMastery™ Quest(ions) may you add here?

Posted in Metaphors, Reactions | Leave a comment